A few weeks back I was sitting at lunch at Noah's Ark talking with a realtor about how we may be able to work together. We talked about how the subprime mess was really making it hard to work with first-time homebuyers. These people drive the real estate market more than anyone else. The Home Ownership Acclerator is not the answer since you need at least 20% down to qualify. It is a better fit for those who have accrued equity in a home and are putting that money down on their second or third home. We decided after an enjoyable two-hour conversation that it probably comes down to education. There are responsible renters out there who could probably buy a home very easily but are waiting to make sure that they don't bite off more than they can chew. They just need a little help with the process. Meanwhile, people who can't come up with first and last months rent are able to buy a home with no money down.
So I went back to my office and mulled it over that afternoon and the next morning. I thought I might have an idea. So I got out my calculator just in case. I compared the home you could buy on a 15-year note to one you could buy on a 30-year note. I compared your equity position in five years. I factored in modest appreciation. Last, I even figured in real estate commissions to sell the property in five years and move up to a bigger, nicer home. The bottom line was that you would have more money in your pocket to put down on your next home if you buy the home you can afford on a 15-year note.
How much home can you afford?
Just last night I was celebrating the end of another productive day. A quiet gentleman came in and stood next to me and ordered a draft. He said nothing except that the TV was a little loud. He stood there for what had to be 20 minutes and I just got this feeling that there was a lot of wisdom there that I would like to hear. Finally, he turned to me and I just knew he was going to say something. "How many ounces is this?" he asked. "9" I replied and then we both went back to minding our own business. Then he ordered what would be his last draft for the evening. We began to talk a little, moving from subject to subject. Finally, we got around to the mortgage market and he began to liven up a little. He and I found we shared some common ground on the issue. He said "When I bought my first home, you had to have 20% down and you couldn't borrow more than 2.5 times your annual income." " When did you buy your first home?" I asked. "1955." Now I know that if I refused to do business with anyone who didn't have 20% for a down payment, I might be passing on some good borrowers in the process but, I liked the 2.5 times your income part.
"Liar Loans" are part of the problem. Originally, stated-income programs were designed for people who possibly have taken full advantage of tax deductions or shelters and are not able to prove their income. In short, their tax returns do not accurately reflect their purchasing power. These programs were not designed for people to lie about their income just so they can get the house they want.
This morning I came to the office and thought about these two gentlemen and thought I might have an idea. I got out my calculator just in case. You can buy a home with no money down but, borrow no more than 2.5 times your annual income and use a 15-year note.
Recent Comments