There seems to be no shortage of opinions out there about how effective the New Deal was. The consensus seems to be that the war was what finally bailed out our economy and not government intervention. Forget politics. Forget spending vs. tax cuts. Either qualifies as government intervention. Here's how it's worked in the past.
What do you think?
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=914d1a00-4421-4ff0-911a-4cdbb1ac973e)
